subject
Social Studies, 08.12.2020 06:00 pindu

In this assignment, you will generate two presentations that cover the same topic. You will use the methods you learned to make your presentations “stand out.” One will incorporate the use of a tagline and the other will use the Rudolph Rule. Total Score: 20 points
1.Pick a topic (person, place, or thing) and go to your favorite search engine to search for that topic. Pick out three facts about that topic and create a one-slide presentation in Impress or PowerPoint.
2.Make sure your slide contains a title text box and a bulleted text box. In the title box, enter the name of the topic. In the bulleted text box, state your three facts in a clear and concise way.
3.Use the Rudolph Rule to highlight one piece of information in your facts. Save this presentation as Presentation_Rudolph_Alize.
4.Now take the same presentation and do a File > Save as alize, and save a new copy as Presentation_Tagline_alize. Replace the name of the topic with a tagline that you believe will draw your audience in.
Submit both presentations, making sure they meet the guidelines below.
CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints Earned
The presentations are the same except for the title.2
Facts are clear and concise.6
One specific piece of one bullet is emphasized in some way.6
One presentation has an effective tagline.6
Total Points20

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:10
Select the correct answer. assume that you are a member of a special interest group that wants to raise taxes on certain items. who would you present your idea to if you wanted it to be proposed as a bill? a. a supreme court justice b. the president c. the american people d. a senator e. a member of the house
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
When we adapt our current understandings to incorporate information we have engaged in?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In this assignment, you will generate two presentations that cover the same topic. You will use the...
Questions
question
Business, 30.11.2021 04:50
Questions on the website: 13722363