The US Senate asks the president to testify before a committee. the president responds that giving testimony would interfere with his job as a chief executive. the US Congress brings charges against the president for refusing to appear before the committee. the US Supreme Court hears the case and rules against the president Which principle of government is shown in this scenario?

Federalism

Due process of law

Checks and balances

Representative democracy

due process

Explanation:

i don't know how to explain it but like it goes through the process because congress brings charges and then supreme court hears it, this is the process of law

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."