Social Studies, 30.09.2019 18:00 tifftifftiff5069

How does the recent use of filibuster compare to how it was used in the past how might it be used in the future

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

In the past, Filibuster happened infrequently and only used for extremely controversial issues, but nowdays they used it for almost all granted bills that cannot be passed.
In the future, it safe to assume the usage of Filibuster will keep increasing

hope this helps

Answer from: timozy95

Filibuster can also be used as a game in politics because it is not limited to its use in the past or present because some countries have used it more than 50 years ago and will have the same effect as in the past.

Further explanation

In the government system, Filibuster is an action that prevents decision making in government, usually with long speeches, so that people in government-run out of time to make decisions. In some countries, this action is prohibited and approved by law, and there are some countries that still have not enacted this law because there is no filibuster action in the governments of several countries. For example in South Korea, Filibuster's actions are still in parliament which has resulted in several of their lottery designs being held because these actions are seen as hampering the passage of a bill using Filibuster. The threat of filibusters often changes the law. The law made against Filibusters is a serious example of some countries against Filibusters which can endanger several countries. Because not only has an impact on the government but also the people, as a result, the people will also demand that the government immediately issue a bill that has not yet been passed, this will also cause the public to lack confidence in the government. which can cause chaos in the government system.

Learn More

Filibusters :

Details

Class: high school

Subject: social studies

Keywords : Filibusters, congresses, democratic

Answer from: Quest

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.

Answer from: Quest

Bwould be the correct answer

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:30

Agroup of people who, because of their physical characteristics or cultural practices, are singled out and treated unequally.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00

Because of the housing bubble, many houses are now selling for much less than their selling price just two to three years ago. there is evidence that homeowners with virtually identical houses tend to ask for more if they paid more for the house. what fallacy are they making?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00

Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30

You are bringing together faculty from different behavioral disciplines to author a new textbook in organizational behavior. represented are professors from psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, political science, and industrial engineering. which faculty member is most likely to furnish information about personality, learning, and motivation?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

How does the recent use of filibuster compare to how it was used in the past how might it be used in...

Questions