Summarize the two arguments (Hamilton vs. Jefferson) in the debate for the banks. 2. Which argument do you think was the strongest and why?

I think that jefferson arguement was the strongest because he's very good at debating plus he's good at writting when it comes to writting. I'm also saying he's good at speaking his mind.

Explanation:

I hope this helped you guys.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

i looked up you question and i found this on quizlet i hope this is one of your answer choices.

modern american cars are not available due to trade restrictions