Answer the questions below and then create three 100 word essays and include any other interesting facts about that sport coming to Atlanta. Include a concluding paragraph with your opinion on the effort, time, and money invested to get each sport to Atlanta – was it worth it? How did professional baseball, football, and basketball get to Atlanta?
What obstacles did the teams face in coming to Atlanta?
Who helped them get to Atlanta?
When did each team come to Atlanta?
Where did they play in Atlanta? What was the name of the original facility and the original location of the place? What did it cost to build the facility?
Submit your essay and questions below.

The Atlanta Braves, a current Major League Baseball franchise, originated in Boston, Massachusetts. This article details the history of the Boston Braves, from 1871 to 1952, after which they moved to Milwaukee to become the Milwaukee Braves, and then eventually to Atlanta to become the Atlanta Braves. The Boston franchise played at South End Grounds from 1871 to 1914 and at Braves Field from 1915 to 1952. Braves Field is now Nickerson Field of Boston University. The franchise, from Boston to Milwaukee to Atlanta, is the oldest continuous professional baseball franchise.[2]

Explanation:

the magna carta is a peace treaty between the king and the rebels. it was made because the the barons captured london in may 1215, so the king was forced to make a treaty with them.the document is written in latin.

hope this and plz mark as brainliest!

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )