How did the Supreme Court rule in Worcester v.
Georgia?

The states had no right to impose regulations on Native American territory.

Explanation:

Samuel A. Worcester was part of a white Christian missionary group living in Cherokee territory in Georgia that advised the natives to resist the state´s effort to impose state laws on them. Worcester was arrested, trialed, and sentenced for his actions, but he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that Georgia had no right to impose its laws on Cherokee territory.

The Supreme Court agreed with his claim, holding Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

the consumer demand because the members have to be aware if people are going to buy what they want to sell in this case either energy drinks or a car wash.

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.