What are the differences between consequentialist concerns regarding euthanasia and non-consequentialist concerns

Answer and Explanation:

Consequentialist concerns about euthanasia are concerned with what can happen after euthanasia is seen in a patient. This kind of concern judges that it will not end up killing a patient who would recover, in addition to worrying about what will happen to the patient's family and even to his soul, after euthanasia is performed.

In contrast, non-consequentialist concerns judge what the consequences will be, but rather what can happen to the patient at the time when euthanasia is being applied. In that case, there are concerns about the patient's well-being, whether he will feel pain and whether he may regret it during the process.

the federal government of the united states was established by the constitution. us is a presidential republic. the president is head of state, head of government and of a two party legislative and electoral system. the supreme court balances the powers of the federal and the state government. yhe executive branch is headed by the oresident. there are two chambers of congress, the senate and the house of representatives. judicial power is exercised by the judicial branch (or judiciary), comprised of the supreme court and lower federal courts. the judiciary's function is to interpret the   constitution as well as the federal laws and regulations.

manifest functions are the recognized and intended consequences of any social pattern, while latent functions are those unrecognized and unintended consequences. to analyze the manifest functions of any social institution, we have to study its contribution to the continuation of a group, community, or society.