PLZZ HELP 50 POINTS Question 1
Part A

In "Homesick," what is the narrator's viewpoint about singing "God Save the King?"

She would prefer to sing the Chinese national anthem because it is where they live.

She does not want to sing the song because thinks it is disloyal to America.

She is jealous of how well the other children sing the song.

She enjoys singing the song because it makes her feel like a part of the group.
Question 2
Part B

Which quotation from the text helps readers to distinguish the narrator's viewpoint from her mother's viewpoint?

"They’d probably try to get the Romans to do what they did, just as they were trying to teach the Chinese to do what Americans did."

"She told me things that sounded so crazy I had to ask my mother if they were true."

“'When in Rome,' she said, 'do as the Romans do.' What she meant was, 'Don’t make trouble. Just sing.'”

"How could she know such things and not tell me? What was the matter with grown-ups anyway?"

When paul realizes no one is coming to the rwandan refugees, he tells them there is only one way for them to get . what is it?

All of the following statements point out negative aspects of the gilded age except: a. politicians gave government jobs to political supporters. b. political bosses cheated large cities out of millions of dollars. c. industrialists bribed members of congress to ensure favorable votes. d. in 1903, wisconsin became the first state to hold primary elections.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.