subject
Social Studies, 30.01.2021 01:00 danny4577

You're a part of a club that wants to create a booth at a fair to raise funds. Which economic system would you use to decide what booth to create, how to set it up, and who should get the money it raises? Use a paragraph of not less than five sentences to explain your answer.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:20
This chart shows the number of soldiers killed according to two different sources. source a is a book written by university professors. source b is from a well-known historical website. in a paragraph, explain why the data presented is different, and evaluate the reliability of each source. which should be used in a school research project, and why?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Why did alexander hamilton support high tariffs?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
What is the supreme court case of smith vs robinson about?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You're a part of a club that wants to create a booth at a fair to raise funds. Which economic system...
Questions
question
Physics, 07.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722367