Which countries are worst off in terms of child hunger?Do you know what part of africa they are in?

How did world war i contribute to the events leading up to world war ii? (a)germans wanted to expand their nation to regain territory in the soviet union. (b)britain and france wanted to force germany to make reparation payments. (c)germans hated the versailles treaty and supported hitler's actions to defy it. (d)the soviet union wanted to take over german territory in eastern europe.

Question 18 multiple choice worth 3 points) (american money lo 4 hc) suppose the federal reserve raises interest rates. which of the following predicts the most likely results? the money supply will decrease, meaning that banks will give fewer loans and prices for goods and services will fall. the money supply will decrease, meaning that more people will buy goods and services and prices will rise, the money supply will increase, meaning that banks will give more loans and more businesses can open and hire workers. the money supply will increase, meaning that prices will rise and businesses will not hire many workers. i will mark the brainliest

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.