PLZ HELP MARK BRAINLIEST If the people were speaking about either supporting the Bourbon Triumvirate OR supporting Tom Watson & the Populists, what would they each say? Write a statement from the perspective of each person that explains their reasons for supporting each group. Include examples and details from the lesson. In the textboxes, write explanations that describe why each person feels the way that they do. ​

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

Describe the relationship between population growth consumption and the environment.

What changes occurred over time that was directly related to this event? alice paul