subject
Social Studies, 15.02.2021 15:10 makayladurham19

Read the text given below and answer the following questions. The period of the early Planned Economy was linked to the disasters of the

collectivisation of agriculture. By 1927- 1928, the towns in Soviet Russia were

facing an acute problem of grain supplies. The government fixed prices at

which grain must be sold, but the peasants refused to sell their grain to

government buyers at these prices. In 1928, Party members toured the grain-

producing areas, supervising enforced grain collections, and raiding ‘kulaks’

the name for well-to-do peasants. As shortages continued, the decision was

taken to collectivise farms. It was argued that grain shortages were partly due

to the small size of holdings. After 1917, land had been given over to

peasants. These small-sized peasant farms could not be modernised. To

develop modern farms, and run them along industrial lines with machinery, it

was necessary to eliminate kulaks, take away land from peasants, and

establish state-controlled large farms

1) Who were ‘kulaks’ ?

2) Point out one reason for grain shortages.

3) What was the decision taken to solve the problem of grain shortages?

4) What was necessary to develop modern farms?​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which choice analyzes the parts of the word and determines the meaning of the word spectator
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
Which powers best complete this graphic?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
Pedestrians,cyclists,skateboarders,and highway construction workers are know as?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read the text given below and answer the following questions. The period of the early Planned Econo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.06.2020 13:09
Questions on the website: 13722360