1. The introduction of sociology as "the study of society" or "the science of man" created a social upheaval in the nineteenth century that destroyed many traditions and social norms. Among these were challenges to religion and the divine right of kings. During the 1960s, other traditions were being challenged by the feminist perspective such as the family and the role of women. What traditions and social norms in today’s society are being challenged in a similar manner? Provide an example and explain in detail.

The tradition of marriage is being challenged in a similar manner today.

Explanation:

In today's society the traditional marriage system that involved two people of different genders have been questioned. Traditionally, marriage used to be seen as a sacred Union between two people who are of different genders, a man and a woman.

These two people would make vows to stay together no matter what. Apart from this they would wait until after the marriage ceremony to stay together. But today marriage is seen in a different way, people easily move in together without any formal marriage. Also people can easily get out of marriages through divorce.

In the society today, the new norm is that people of same genders can be in relationships and get married. A long time ago this would never be possible.

This goes to show that the society is evolving and very different from what we used to know existed.

51% were unhappy, i think .   ; )

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: