Read the passages below and answer the question that follows. Malaria, a disease spread by mosquitoes, infects about 300 million people a year and causes about 1 million deaths a year. Children are most vulnerable to the disease, whereas most adults rebound fairly quickly.

Many NGOs work to disseminate mosquito nets in sub-Saharan Africa in an effort to reduce the incidence of malaria, but results have been limited. Experts state that a different approach is needed to resolve this major health epidemic, including taking suggestions from the very people who are affected by the disease.

Why is it important to include the people affected by malaria in developing ways to prevent the disease? What are some of the suggestions they might make?

Rather than have a third party or an expert develop an outside solution, ideas from within the affected communities might best lead to a more expansive adoption of the habit. Public health officials could focus on educating mothers on the severity of the disease in child mortality, which might lead them to use the nets for their children’s protection. Collaboration among health experts and local people might produce a solution that would allow for prevention instead of the need for medical intervention.

Explanation:

Response may vary but should include this.

They give a better idea of the citiria needed for the solution to work like cost

Explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.