IF you want you can jion my Zo om...
Meeting ID: 924 7424 7572
Passcode: uPQ15g...
Social Studies, 23.02.2021 19:40 travyse
IF you want you can jion my Zo om...
Meeting ID: 924 7424 7572
Passcode: uPQ15g
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
How did the end of the mexican american war result in growing sectionalism in the united states?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30
One result of recent migration trends is that the workforce in europe has become
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
History, 27.04.2021 22:00
Social Studies, 27.04.2021 22:00
History, 27.04.2021 22:00
Social Studies, 27.04.2021 22:00
English, 27.04.2021 22:00
English, 27.04.2021 22:00
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 22:00
Chemistry, 27.04.2021 22:00
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 22:00
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 22:00
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 22:00
Social Studies, 27.04.2021 22:00