Please Help 100 Points Is Due At 5:30PM Today. GIVE A LITTLE HISTORY ON GA'S IMPORTANT PEOPLE AND DEFINE THE KEY TERMS Below
Important People Of Georgia:
James Oglethorpe, American Indians, Robert Castell, King George 2, Mary Musgrove, John Musgrove, John Reynolds, Henry Ellis, Sir. James Wright, The Trustees, The Highland Scots, and The Salzburgers
Key Terms:
Georgia
Savannah
Mercantilism
Tomochichi
Yamacraw
Altamaha River
Royal Governors
Bicameral
Colonial Crops
Court of Conscience

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.

On this map, the state of georgia is in which section of the map?

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.