In this sentence "the people in attendance cheered when when their team scored the winning goal." is this an artion or act or the state of

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

It seems that ypur question is incomplete.

However, trying to help you we can say the following.

In this sentence: "the people in attendance cheered when their team scored the winning goal." Is this an action or act or the state of the mass reaction of mass conduct?

We can say it is a combination of both. It is an action because most people that are considered "fans" of that team, have feelings for the team, like the sport, and cheer when the team scores and wins. They feel good when the team wins because they respect what the team represents.

On the other hand, we can say that it could be the reaction to mass conduct because if people are in a stadium -for instance- they react and follow instinctively what the other people say and do. That is why people in the bleachers scream, shout, cheer, and behave in strange ways they normally do not do.

for many centuries there were important factors which the economies of the muslim empires developed increasingly. they applied economic procedures in production, investment, finance, taxation and property. they used to tax certain goods (for example: harvest), they charged interest on money lent, they signed contracts with merchants; they relied on a common currency, and they used checks as well as promissory notes. with the money collected by means of taxation, the government provided the needy with an income. in addition, trading networks covered huge distances, so far regions started to have contact and exchange goods. this trade network covered areas of asia, africa and europe.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals