Social Studies, 28.02.2021 16:20 Yasin36

The Federal Aviation Administration has banned the presence of giant lizards on airplanes. Corina has a business training lizards for use in television and movies. Her star lizard, a massive iguana named Izzy, likes to have her own seat on the airplane. In order to promote her business, Corina has asked her home state of Montana to pass a law permitting giant lizards on airplanes. Would a Montana state law permitting giant lizards on airplanes be constitutional? a. No, because it would be an unreasonable "seizure" under the Fourth Amendment.
b. No, because of the supremacy clause.
c. Yes, because otherwise it would substantially interfere with business and the commerce clause protects travel between states.
d. Yes, because of the equal protection clause
e. Yes, but only if there was a rational basis for the law.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30

Compare and contrast walden and "the experiences of the a.c." include the authors, their ideas, and reasons of their failures from a christian perspective.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:40

Which statement presents a counterclaim to james cross giblin's viewpoint? egyptian hieroglyphs provide information about the country's history, medicine, science, and laws. the rosetta stone allowed people to read ancient egyptian writing. learning how to read hieroglyphs is the best way to understand the ancient culture of the egyptians. digging up ancient egyptian tombs teaches us more about the way people lived than hieroglyphs do

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00

Why were colonist mad about the tea act if it actually lowered the price of tea

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00

Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution. if it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . become much less important. . i still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

The Federal Aviation Administration has banned the presence of giant lizards on airplanes. Corina ha...

Questions