Which of the following would be an effective way for Mexico to decrease the number of its citizens migrating away from the country? A. United States increases anti-poverty efforts for residents of the USA.
B. Guatemala builds a wall across its border with Mexico.
C. Mexico uses tax money to build more schools.
D. Mexico enforces fewer anti-drug laws.

The answer would be C.

Explanation:

A. wouldn't do anything for Mexico, it would just make more Mexican citizens flea from Mexico.

B. wouldn't work at all because a wall has been proven not to stop anyone.

D. wouldn't work either. Mexico enforcing or not enforcing anti-drug laws has been proven not to change anything. In fact, to compare this so that it makes more sense, guns are completely illegal in Mexico, and Mexican Citizens and Cartels still have so many firearms that are usually illegal in the United States. So what would happen if they even tried to change anything about enforcing fewer or more anti-drug laws?

Main point is that education opportunities in Mexico would make a huge change, especially if it was more politic related because then it would cause another type of revolution to occur, resulting in people wanting to fight for a good cause and a better future for Mexico.

c

Explanation:

i know

either wyoming or idaho

nigger, that word was originated for white folks   to keep black people under

and when black people use it, they know that's just how they greet each other

and when white folks use it, they know there's a double meaning under