In what ways did the limit on congress prevent the new government from uniting the country for a common good?

- It ways difficult raising money as a Congress through tac for development, as any money to be raised would need it request passed through states.

- Each state were kind of maintaining their freedom and independence, this was also a limitation for governance by the congress

Explanation:

The limit in the Congress prevented the unity of the country in the following ways;

- It ways difficult raising money as a Congress through tac for development, as any money to be raised would need it request passed through states.

- Each state were kind of maintaining their freedom and independence, this was also a limitation for governance by the congress

- Congress could not regulate trade

- Finally, drafting of soldiers were out of their reach.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.