PLEASE HELP! PLS PLS PLS PLS PLS PLS PL! I WILL DO LITERALLY ANYTHING I NEED A LOT OF HELP A Now let's put all these ideas into practice to apply the six features of S. P.R. I.T. E to the ancient Greek civilizations you studied in this module. Open the Ancient Greece S. P.R. I.T. E Template. Refer to the lessons in Module Four to complete the chart. Then, respond to the reflection questions.

In some areas of daily life, Sparta and Athens were so different that they have been divided into two columns on the chart. In other ways, like religious beliefs, the two were very similar and will share a response.
SPARTA ATHENS
Social Describe society in Sparta. Use the Athens example to guide you. Athenian girls did not receive much education and had traditional household roles when they grew up. Athenian women could be citizens, but they could not vote. The primary role of male, land-owning citizens was to participate in the direct democracy. Non-male citizens were merchants, farmers. Slaves could not vote.
Political Sparta was an oligarchy, where power was held by a few men, usually wealthy nobles. They had an Assembly. Describe government in Sparta. Use the Sparta example to guide you.
Religion Use the terms polytheism, sacrifices, temples and festivals to write four sentences about the religious beliefs of the Greeks.
Intellectual Write one to two sentences about EACH of these Greek thinkers: Euclid, Ptolemy, Socrates, and Draco.
Technology Consider how technology plays a part in war. Finishes each of the sentences below.

Athens led Greece in the Persian Wars because …

Sparta won the Peloponnesian War because ….
Economy Describe the economy of Sparta. Slaves were captured in war and owned by individuals. Freedman were craftsmen and traders. There was a large merchant class. Athens formed the Delian League and grew rich after the Persian War.
Reflection Questions. Answer the following questions in three to four complete sentences each.

What are the similarities between the United States government and democracy in Athens?

Which city-state would you prefer to live in and why? Give at least 3 reasons to support your answer.

As citizens grow increasingly wary of whose interests are being represented in the public policy arena, especially in light of recent sensational scandals showing a cozy relationship between professional lobbyists and lawmakers, a crisis of confidence is engulfing many democratic societies across the european and north american continents. public perceptions of undue influence peddling, in which special interest groups exercise too much sway over government for self-serving purposes, have led to growing demands for the regulation of lobbyists and transparency of the policymaking process. the united states and canada have been struggling for decades to refine their systems of lobbyist regulation. of all the shortcomings of the north american model of lobbyist regulation – and there are many – transparency is not, for the most part, one of them. many european countries have also been experimenting with systems of lobbyist regulation. until recently, however, the european national experiments have produced very different results among themselves and in comparison with the north american counterparts. surprisingly, some of the earliest efforts to regulate lobbying occurred among new democratic countries in eastern europe rather than the more advanced industrial democracies of western europe. this observation stands in stark contrast to the north american experience, where lobbyist regulation emerged as an effort to manage a highly developed class of professional lobbyists within the strictures of long-standing democratic principles. the authors find that the answer to this anomaly lies in the fact that early european lobbyist regulations focused not on  transparency  as a means to regain public confidence in government, but on providing business interests with  access  to lawmakers as a means to bolster fledgling economies. this focus on access is quickly giving way to demands for transparency as many european governments, racked by scandal, are striving to salvage the public's trust. propelled largely by example from a reluctant european parliament and commission, which are themselves attempting to convince europe that a regional government is in its own interest, several european countries are beginning to make a transition from weak systems of lobbyist regulation, which emphasize business access, to strong systems of lobbyist regulation, which emphasize public transparency. in order to discern ‘best’ practices for achieving transparency through lobbying regulation, the authors first chart the regulatory systems of the united states and canada. that is followed by an analysis of all of the european lobbying regimes. the oft-expressed objection to this new trend toward transparency in europe – that professional lobbyists view such regulations as overly burdensome – is undercut by research on european and american lobbyists’ attitudes toward regulation, which are generally quite favorable. like everyone else, lobbyists realize that they have an image problem and that the best way to address that problem is by operating in the broad daylight of public transparency. finally, the authors offer recommendations on how to enhance transparency in policymaking, drawing from detailed comparisons of the north american and european models of lobbyist regulation.

The will be a : great britain wanted french gold mines