Plz help! What will be the consequences of withholding crucial information from the court in the scenario?
During the Hastings v. California trial, prosecutor Evelyn Lynch came across evidence exonerating defendant Adam Baker from the concerned crime. However, Lynch failed to present this evidence to the court. There were some serious consequences when the court found out that Lynch was withholding crucial information: she
and

lost her job and was barred from practicing law

Explanation:

explanation:

may i ask what challenges?

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.