Napisz 2 argumenty do 2 tez Teza: kto pod kim dołki kopie, sam w nie wpada i druga teza: każdy jest kowalem swojego losu prosze ratujcie mnie :')

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

On a supply and demand graph, equilibrium is the point where the two curves meet. the supply curve begins. the supply curve ends. the demand curve ends.

What are the most populous and least areas of russia and why are some areas more heavily populated than others