Consider the following argument: "A massive two-minute-long, 9.0-level earthquake shock Bellevue, Washington on April 10, 2021. Thus, some buildings in Bellevue were damaged. Which three words
accurately describe this argument? (A) inductive, strong, uncogent, (B) inductive, weak, uncogent, (C)
deductive, weak, uncogent, (D) deductive, valid, unsound, (E) none of the above

this doesn't support enough information to answer the question.

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.

its c i google it wish u luck

answer; regard the action of other people negatively;