In 2010, Randy Terrill, a state representative from Oklahoma, offered a bribe to a state
senator to get her to leave her office. After an investigation, a judge decided that there was
enough evidence that Terrill had violated the law, and he was tried in court. In 2013, Terrill was
convicted of bribery and sentenced to one year in prison.
Explain which constitutional principle
this scenario illustrates. What evidence led you to that
conclusion? (1 point)

Is there such a thing as a social structure that constrains individual action, or is society nothing more than a figment of our imaginations?

Which of these persons was a co-founder of twitter? eric schmidt jack dorsey tim cook paul alle

Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist