subject
Social Studies, 08.10.2019 03:30 jayjay2006

What is the equivalent of fbi here on canada? is that grc? / quel est l'équivalent du fbi ici au canada? est-ce que ses la grc?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:20
Saade, morin, and thomas (2012) describe critical thinking as the mental processes of discernment, analysis, and evaluation applied to information in order to achieve a logical final understanding and/or judgment. describe your approach to breaking down information into component parts to better understand the characteristics of a statement, concept, or problem. how might outlining to develop understanding? how do you know when to reach beyond previous experience and seek out other sources of information to enhance your understanding of the work in front of you? (this response does not require research support.)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
Which factor contributed to the rise of african empires such as ghana and mali ? a. their creation and involvement in trade networks b. they focused only on agricultural production. c. they didn’t engage in warfare with other nations d. their geographic location protected them from attacks.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
8. select a supreme court case that has been particularly important in protecting civil liberties in the united states. in a three-paragraph essay, describe the case and the ruling, then explain how the case demonstrates why it is important that the supreme court is: a. protected from political or public pressure (since justices are appointed rather than elected and serve lifetime terms) b. able to change its interpretations of the law over time (10 points)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What is the equivalent of fbi here on canada? is that grc? / quel est l'équivalent du fbi ici au c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 15:01
question
History, 20.09.2020 15:01
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 20.09.2020 15:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 15:01
question
History, 20.09.2020 15:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 15:01
Questions on the website: 13722363