What social dilemma did adam smith address in the wealth of nations?

Smith's Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,

His main claims is to explain  that the pursuit of self-interest does achieve social good.

Explanation:

Smith's Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,

His main claims is to explain  that the pursuit of self-interest does achieve social good.

Adam Smith held a chair of moral philosophy, he writes to highlight the good noble side of what today we call the free market, as he is seeing the emergence of capitalist England.

As a contemporary to Malthus, Ricardo, Mill, he is rather a philosopher than an economist, and as such he discusses the way mercantilism will be replaced.

According to his view, The Selfish choices drive individuals towards providing the best products and offering the best even if their interest is selfish.

By this, he uses an image often labeled "The invisible hand", which is an automatic mechanism that works on making selfish choices form the best conditions for economy without the interference of a sovereign or any king.

He develops a historical discussion on the way mercantilism developed and how an emerging economy in England is achieving benefits in contrast to southern European nations .

i would say b probably

the correct answer is "c": the pillars proclaimed his regret at the bloodshed at the battle of kalinga and his conversion to buddhism.

the kalinga war is considered as one of the largest battles in the history of india. it was fought between the between the maurya empire, which ruled the lands of what is now known as india at the time, and the independent feudal kingdom of kalinga.

the army of maurya empire, led by its king ashoka, fought a prolonged war against kalinga. the war ended around 262 bce with the victory of the maurya empire. it is believed that ashoka, after having witnessed the loss of many lives during this war, felt deep responsibility and eventually converted into buddhism.