1. in a time when few people considered native americans to be worthy of equal rights, chief justice john marshall was willing to stand up for the native americans. in the worcester v. georgia case, the cherokee asked the supreme court to stop the state of georgia from enforcing its laws on the cherokee's land. in 1832, marshall ruled that the government of georgia did not have the right to enforce its laws on cherokee lands. this ruling allowed cherokees to stay on their homeland.

from the passage, one can see that chief justice john marshall used his authority to
native americans gain some rights.
stop all of the
native americans' problems.
create a treaty between whites and cherokees.
end much of the prejudice against native americans.

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.