Social Studies, 20.08.2019 20:00 Joeyoman

Right to grand jury indictment, no double jeopardy, freedom from self-incrimination, due process of law
a. amendment six
b. amendment nine
c. amendment one
d. amendment five

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: gigi1229

The Fifth Amendment (D Amendment Five) allows for the protection of the right to a grand jury indictment, no double jeopardy, freedom from self incrimination, and due process of law.

Answer from: sandraranger

D it is the fifth amendment The Fifth Amendment part of the protects against a person being compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in a criminal case. Taking the Fifth is a colloquial term for invoking the privilege that allows a witness to decline to answer questions that might incriminate him or her, without penalty or it counting against him or her. A defendant can not be compelled to become a witness at his or her own trial, but if he or she should testify, he or she is not entitled to the privileges and inferences that can be drawn from a refusal to answer

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

the answer would be in this answer. someone already asked the question.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:20

Emily naturally blinks whenever her sister pretends she is going to poke her in the eye. her sister, a psychology major, then decides to have a little fun. she pairs the word “psychology” (neutral stimulus) with pretending to poke emily in the eye (unconditioned stimulus), which automatically makes emily blink (unconditioned response). soon, emily blinks as soon as she hears the word “psychology.” when emily blinks when hearing the word “psychology,” even when her sister does not pretend to poke her in the eye, the word “psychology’ is now the

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:20

John redmond was not paid for trim carpentry work that he did for brenda knighton in her home. ms. knighton does not dispute that redmond did the work, but she says that he waited too long to file the suit because the time for suit is measured from the time the work began, which was over 4 years ago, and not from the time she failed to pay, which was two years ago. the statute of limitations in their state is four years. which of the following is a correct statement? the csae must be dismissed because of the statute of limitations the case qualifies for a directed verdict the case can be decided on a summary judgment motion the case can be dismissed on a judgment of the pleadings

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00

This refers to weather and atmospheric conditions measured over a long period of time.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:20

Which of the following discoveries would be most likely to cause a scientific paradigm shift? a. the discovery of more rings around uranus b. the discovery of a new pathogenic virus transmitted by mosquitoes c. the discovery that a dormant volcano is showing signs of activity d. the discovery of a new species of salamander in the amazon rainforest e. the discovery that excess heat is radiating from the center of the earth and causing global climate change

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Right to grand jury indictment, no double jeopardy, freedom from self-incrimination, due process of...

Questions