Why does the house impose severe limits on floor debates? a) it allows the speaker to better control the contets of a bill b) bill mainly are debated in subcommittees not on the floor, c) most debates take place in the senate rather than the house d) the house is so big that long debate is extremely time consuming

Option D, the house is so big that long debate is extremely time consuming, is the right answer.

Explanation:

In a legislature, a floor is a place where all the members of the legislature make speeches. When any of the members are speaking formally on the ongoing issue, he is said to have the floor. The "Floors" have been placed with proper procedures and protocols. Since a legislature have many members and long debates can be time-consuming, therefore, the House impose strict limits on floor debates.

the minoans were group of people living in the greek islands of crete in the mediterranean sea during the bronze age

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )