The sixth amendment was interpreted in (3 points)

a) gideon v. wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

b) gideon v. wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

c) miranda v. arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

d) miranda v. arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy

The ability to accurately gauge the distance of the coffee cup on your desk as you reach for it is called:

Should domestic security cases be handled differently than other types crimes?