According to the video clips, chomsky suggests that even young children are able to invert interpretations. how does this support his view that language acquisition is more heavily steeped in a nature perspective?

I believe the answer is: At a young age, children demonstrate the ability to invert interpretations of heard speech without necessarily having heard evidence that verifies these interpretations. This implies an innate mechanism by which such inversions and interpretations are processed
.

From the information above, we can infer that primates (such as chimps and human) born with a certain type of ability to communicate which printed in our genetic composition. This explains why all expressions and gestures that made from people in different culture generally interpreted as the same.

buying socks and buying shoes are independent events.

probably 3 since archeologists and historians don’t understand there writing.