Why was the judiciary act was "repugnant," or contradictory, to the constitution?

select the choice that best answers the question.

the act legalized morally repulsive behavior.

the act explicitly denied the right of judicial review.

the act refused to finalize william marbury's appointment as a federal judge.

the act enlarged the jurisdiction of the supreme court, which can only be done by changing the constitution.

What policy did "jim crow" laws put in place? black codes integration segregation 2. the supreme court case that established the doctrine of "separate but equal" was dred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education 3. the supreme court case that overturned the doctrine of "separate but equal" wasdred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education

What do supreme court decisions based on the first amendment usually involve?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.