Situation 1
brian and his family have lived next to a factory for more than 15 years. brian works at the factory. although he finds it convenient that his workplace is within walking distance, he’s worried about the negative effect of the pollution caused by the factory on his family. his children have developed asthma, and he and his wife consistently get respiratory illnesses every year. last night, he saw on the news that the government has just passed a law that limits the amount of pollution every factory in his state can emit. brian is hopeful now that his family’s health will begin to improve.

situation 2
the peña family has owned the local factory for generations. the penas believe they are good corporate neighbors. they employ many people from the neighborhood, pay their taxes in full and on time, and donate to many charities. when they hear that the government has passed a law that requires companies to limit the amount of pollution they emit, the penas get a little tense. they realize that it will cost them a huge amount of money to bring their factory into compliance. this expense will make the factory less profitable for them. to offset that loss of profit, they may have to donate less to the charities. they also worry they will not be able to employ as many people.

how do the attitudes of brian and the pena family toward the new law differ?

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: