subject
Social Studies, 22.04.2021 18:50 carleygalloway103

Do you believe that globalization is a good thing? Write at least one paragraph and include reasons/evidence from g oogle to support ur answer

Dont just copy from a websiye ok
NO LINKS OR YOU GET A REPORT

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:30
Jonathan purchases a comic book over the phone. the store does not promise a particular time in which the comic book will be shipped to jonathan. after 40 days, the comic book has not been shipped. do state or federal laws protect jonathan's rights in this case? what is the name of the law? select the best answer from the choices provided. a. federal law; the implied warranty of merchantability b. state law; the implied warranty of merchantability c. federal law; the mail and telephone order rule d. state law; the mail and telephone order rule
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What words in the preamble to the constitution reflect the principle of popular sovereignty
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:50
Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Do you believe that globalization is a good thing? Write at least one paragraph and include reason...
Questions
question
English, 31.08.2020 03:01
Questions on the website: 13722367