Susan is a flight attendant for a large airline. She exclusively works a long flight from Chicago to Vienna, and is expected to constantly maintain a positive attitude no matter what situation arises. Over the years, Susan has noticed that when dealing with Americans, their emotions tend to run higher in stressful situations, as opposed to Austrian passengers who tend to be more reserved in stressful or unhappy situations, and she often feels frustrated. If Susan wants to reduce the amount of psychological damage caused by the emotional dissonance her job creates, she should

Who is on the senate intelligence committee?

For an actor, keeping his mind on will ultimately his performance.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.