Friend in iq 11_gut let's begin new people and stay forever ​

This essay will discuss two speeches perils of indifference by elie wiesel, and on women is right to vote by susan b. anthony. the difference between elie wiesel's speech and susan b. anthony's is lack of equal right where as elie wiesel's is about wwii. the similarities between these two speeches and events are indifference or lack of concern, in both cases these events happened due to lack of concern for both parties. the nation had a lack of concern for those fighting for their lives in europe for many years, as did men about women's right to vote, many did not seem to care that women's rights were not being exercised

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy

1. how did conditions in germany and europe at the end of world war i contribute to the rise and triumph of nazism in germany? 2. how did the german government under nazi rule build support among the german people? 3. how did nazi germany gradually isolate, segregate, impoverish, and incarcerate jews and persecute other perceived enemies of the state between 1933 and 1939? 4. how did the nazis lead germany to war in europe and, with their collaborators, kill millions—including systematically murdering six million jewish people? 5. why is learning about the holocaust important? so we don’t repeat history.