subject
Social Studies, 07.05.2021 01:20 stef76

How does fiscal policy impact aggregate demand?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
50 ! kate is 14 years old and just started taking dance classes with her friends at a local dance studio. this is her first time in a dance program, so everything is new to her. her friends convinced her to join the class since they have been enjoying it for a few months. how could the following terms her succeed in the dance class? ● secondary reinforcement ● identity vs. role confusion ● observational learning how could the following terms hinder her success in the class? ● circadian rhythm ● basal ganglia ● vestibular sense
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
Write a sentence with valiant and steadfast
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
How does fiscal policy impact aggregate demand?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
History, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
French, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Social Studies, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Health, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
English, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 14:01
question
History, 18.09.2020 14:01
Questions on the website: 13722360