In terms of undercover police operations, Kantian deontology or ethical formalism would most likely assert which of the following? a. Support undercover operations even if innocent people are deceived, as long as the greater good was being served. b. ​Condemn undercover operations where innocent people are deceived because such actions could not be justified under the categorical imperative. c. Allow undercover operations only if the general community approved the action ahead of time. d. Condemn undercover operations if the police agent failed to gather necessary intelligence or useful evidence.

Which statement is a good description of a model? a) models are a description of nature based only on one or two variables. b) models are testable ideas but they are not very to most people. c) models are a description of nature that predicts more accurately than real events. d) models are an approximiation of a real system that omits all but most essential variables in a system.

What is douglass's purpose in the speech "the hypocrisy of american slavery, july 4, 1852" ? how does douglass reveal his purpose to the reader?

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.