*Use your analysis to write a secondary source/a summary of the Emancipation Proclamation. Include the following: Who: (Who wrote it, Who it was for, Who did it impact)
What: (What was to happen? What did it accomplish?) (Cite Evidence)
When: (When did it take effect?)
Where: (Where did it have an impact?)
Why: (Why was it written? Its purpose.) (Cite Evidence)
How: (How did it impact the Civil War? How did it change America?)

*Be sure to give at least two pieces of cited evidence for the questions indicated above.

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

When analyzing the election of 1876, what conclusion can be drawn? a.a majority of northerners wanted to enforce reconstruction policies more stringently.b.if tilden had won the electoral votes from louisiana, florida, or south carolina, he would have been elected president.c.the republican party had increased its support in the south.d.rutherford hayes did poorly in the western states.e.the republican party did a good job protecting the voting rights of african-americans in mississippi.

This excerpt supports the idea that the sky chief valued