Twenty-Seven Educators who were female said boys in their classroom were the most challenging in the classroom and the reason for that is because many of the boys have
difficulty following the traditional classroom expectations that are developmentally
appropriate Mistaken behaviors occur at three levels: experimentation, socially
influenced, and strong unmet needs. Experimentation is when a child starts to explore
their environment and engage in activities and build relationships with others. The child
is driven by their curiosity and become too involved in an unintentional disagreement
and the new situation is getting out of hand due to their inexperience. The second level
of mistaken behavior is socially influence which is when a child copies another child who
is displaying mistaken behavior. The third level of mistaken behavior, Strong Unmet
Needs which is when a child's mistaken behavior starts to worsen, and they are acting
out due to physical or mental needs. Educators need to avoid viewing children a certain
way due to their gender. Educators should go to a seminar/or workshop that talks about
Mistaken Behavior and the three levels of mistaken behavior to help educators know
how they can create a more effective, safe environment that offers assistance to the
children especially the boys.
Can you please shorten this?

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

your answer is a hope that .

answer; the georgia militia men mortally wounded their commander;

answer; goals and feedback are present;