subject
Social Studies, 20.05.2021 21:40 heavenjackson127

Which of Montesquieu’s and Rousseau’s ideas was adopted by republican governments in Europe and North America in the 1700s? The powers of the state should be separated.
The powers of the state should be separated.

A government works best when ruled by a monarch.
A government works best when ruled by a monarch.

Only kings have the right to rule a country.
Only kings have the right to rule a country.

The government should represent only wealthy landowners.
The government should represent only wealthy landowners.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30
Why did the settlement of east texas stop in the late 1710s
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Describe the difference between native american beliefs about land "ownership" and european beliefs. savestylesformat instructions
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Take a moment to consider other countries and their form of government. select a country that does not utilize the same form of democracy that the united states uses, identify the country you chose and compare their form of government to the u.s. how are the different types of government the same? how do they differ? which type of government do you think is more beneficial to it's citizen's?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of Montesquieu’s and Rousseau’s ideas was adopted by republican governments in Europe and Nort...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 01.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 01.09.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722361