The intention of the framers of our Constitution was for the members of Congress to act in a spirit of compromise. In this way, resulting legislation would reflect the interests of the many rather than those of a particular faction. In practice, what are the dangers and inefficiencies when party unity and partisanship cause Congress to become deadlocked and unable to agree upon action? Provide examples from recent history

The Congress

Explanation:

There are 2 chambers in USA congressnamed:

They are fundamentally the core of the USA type of government as they handle the issue of lawmaking, addressing individuals, performing oversight, helping constituents and teaching the general population. The public authority in this manner channels the greater part of its bills to the house whose individuals are casted a ballot in as either conservatives or leftists. Few however come from other associate gatherings.  

At the point when they neglect to concur of an issue, the public authority may even close down. For example, on 30/9/2013,The U.S. government shut down after administrators in the House and the Senate couldn't concur on a spending bill to subsidize the public authority. They couldn't concede to the Obamacare as conservatives and leftist representatives had various perspectives on the law.  

Our constitution was consequently made for such conflicts to happen so correction can be made towards public advantage yet not individual or gathering advantage. The congress has hence filled in as the core of USA governmental issues as they endeavor to just pass and make alterations that blessing people in general.

q1: artillery

q2: simon bolivar

q3:   their workers and farmers demanded a return to spanish rule.

q4: drafted new constitutions

q5: oligarchies have replaced monarchies

which sentences ? that question is incomplete