How does the reduction of the rabbit population affect the energy flow in the food pyramid below? A) The amount of the grass will increase.
B) The snake population will increase.
C) The owl population will increase.
D) The amount of grass will decrease.

Which of the following correctly describes a repurchase agreement? the sale of a security with a commitment to repurchase the same security at a specified future date and a designated price. the sale of a security with a commitment to repurchase the same security at a future date left unspecified, at a designated price. the purchase of a security with a commitment to purchase more of the same security at a specified future date.

Which statement about jews is not correct? question 6 options: a: jews had been disliked and persecuted for many centuries. b: jews lived and worked in businesses throughout germany. c: many germans blamed jews for germany’s economic problems. d: jews began migrating to germany after the end of world war i.

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.