High-performing teams engage in a variety of actions, including the following: Focusing first and foremost on performance Going through natural stages of development, including forming, storming, norming, and performing Building a work culture around values, norms, and goals Meeting often Embracing differing viewpoints and conflict Finding out the communication styles and preferences of one another Providing a lot of positive feedback and evaluating their performance often Feeling a common sense of purpose

The term "jim crow" is used to describe which of these? a) bans on hunting b) segregation of the races c) preventing women from voting d) creating more public schools

Which of the following makes someone an entrepreneur? a.) becoming a partner in a major law firm b.) becoming a highly paid dancer c.) earning a lot of money as a computer programmer d.) running a company that hires people to fix computers

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.