Social Studies, 07.06.2021 17:00 jermainedwards

Consider the following arguments from analogy. According our rules for appraising analogical reasoning, if a subsequent consideration strengthens the argument, answer a. Answer b if a consideration weakens the argument. Answer c if a consideration does not affect the argument. Bill has taken three history courses and found them very stimulating and valuable. So he signs up for another one, confidently expecting that it too will be worthwhile

1. Suppose that his previous history courses were in ancient history, modern European history, and American history
2. Suppose that his previous history courses had all been taught by the same professor that is scheduled to teach the present one..
3. Suppose that his previous history courses all had been taught by Professor Smith and the present one is taught by Professor Jones.
4. Suppose that Bill had found his three previous history courses to be the most exciting intellectual experiences of his life.
5. Suppose that his previous history courses had all met on Taco Tuesday, and the present one is scheduled to meet on Taco Tuesday, also.
6. Suppose that, in addition to the three history courses previously taken, Bill also had taken and enjoyed courses in anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30

Explain comment: much of the thought upon which present-day democratic government rests began as a challenge to the theory of the divine right of kings

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30

Occurs with the fully informed request of a competant adult patient or their surrogate. culture of life: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. voluntary euthanasia b. nonvoluntary euthanasia c. involuntary euthanasia d. passive euthanasia

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00

Jimmy carter served in the georgia senate from 1963-1967. which issue would he have been most likely to have delt with as a georgia senator

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Consider the following arguments from analogy. According our rules for appraising analogical reasoni...

Questions