Explain the core concepts of the Canons of Journalism being violated and how such violations might be defended in the scenario. Scenario: You have a friend who is a budding journalist, and he is very interested in investigative journalism. That is, he wants to do a lot of "digging" to get at the really interesting parts of a story and uncover wrongdoings that the public should know about. In the pursuit of this, he is being driven by his own political views, in which he has exaggerated truths in a few instances. He feels it is necessary to exaggerate truths, at times, in order to communicate the seriousness of the situation.

What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

Me asap worth brainlieist and 50 points