Jackson, a conservative Republican, and Jessica, a liberal Democrat, both watch the same news show in separate houses. Neither are happy with the coverage of a particular story. What is the BEST explanation for how this can be? a. framing effects
b. filtering effects
c. contrarian effects
d. the hostile media effect

Option D

Explanation:

In simple words, The hostile media impact, also known as the antagonistic media hypothesis or antagonistic media interpretation, is indeed a spatial principle of information dissemination that describes how people with powerful pre - existing attitudes on issues perceive media coverage as biassed against them and in favour of their opponents' viewpoint.

Option d (the hostile media effect) is the correct approach.

Explanation:

All other given alternatives aren't related to the scenario given. So the above is the correct response.

what are the choices? the multiple choices?

i will answer in the comments after the choices have been said.

answer; ///(positive correlation);