subject

How are we best able to subject our ideas to the scrutiny of others?
Only by opening ourselves to information, insights, and critique from a variety
of different people

By eliciting insights and information relevant to understanding issues

By identifying, articulating, and applying reasoned responsive assessments of
issues, and take into account assumptions, facts, values, and perspectives of
others

Engaging in disagreement, questioning deliberatively, assessing the credibility
of information, and thinking critically

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
Describe the cultural component "innovation." give two examples. give an example of the cultural component "cultural universals."
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
The economic crash that began in 1929 was called the great recession, great depression, great slump, great revolution
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
How are we best able to subject our ideas to the scrutiny of others?
Only by opening oursel...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.09.2020 20:01
question
Chemistry, 05.09.2020 20:01
Questions on the website: 13722362