Which of the following is a categorical syllogism. a. All birds are flying creatures.
b. All flying creatures are animals that can crash. Therefore, all birds are animals that can crash. If it is a bird, then it is a flying creature. If it is a flying creature, then it is a creature that can crash. Therefore if it is a bird, then it is a creature that can crash. It is either a bird or a fish. It is not a bird. Therefore, it is a fish.
c. All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers. That creature up in the sky is certainly flying, so it must also have feathers.

C. All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers. That creature up in the sky is certainly flying, so it must also have feathers.

Explanation:

Syllogism is a logical argument with two premises and one conclusion. A categorical syllogism has three propositions which include two premises and one conclusion; a general/major premise, a minor premise and then a conclusion. The major premise,minor premise and conclusion in the above syllogism respectfully are

" All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers","That creature up in the sky is certainly flying", "so it must also have feathers".

c- companies fail to take environmental protection into account. i think

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.